When commissioners are considering a new pathway or system, the conversation is rarely about features. It’s about risk, assurance, and whether something will actually work in the reality of their local system.
Over time, a familiar set of questions comes up again and again.
Here’s what commissioners really ask us and how NHS teams are answering those questions in practice.
No one wants to digitise a problem and push it downstream. Commissioners want to know whether a new workflow genuinely improves flow across the whole pathway.
In practice, teams report:
In Leicester, Leicestershire & Rutland, referral rejections on the cataract pathway reduced to near zero after moving onto Cinapsis, removing weeks of avoidable delay for patients.
That’s not optimisation around the edges, it’s a structural improvement.
Interoperability is non-negotiable.
Commissioners want reassurance that new tools won’t sit in isolation or create parallel processes clinicians have to work around.
Cinapsis is designed to work alongside core NHS infrastructure, including:
For teams, this means:
Digital change works best when it fits into how clinicians already operate, not when it asks them to change everything at once.
With workforce capacity under strain everywhere, commissioners are rightly focused on whether digital change frees time or adds burden.
In Staffordshire & Shropshire, Diabetic Eye Screening referrals were historically paper-based, involving scanning, emailing and manual checks.
After rolling out Cinapsis, UHNM’s clinical lead reported:
“Admin teams estimate a 60% saving in admin time.”
That time doesn’t disappear, it’s redirected back into patient-facing work and operational resilience.
Adoption is where many programmes succeed or fail.
Commissioners know that if clinicians don’t trust or value a system, it won’t embed regardless of how well it performs on paper.
Across regions, feedback from frontline users has been consistent:
In Lincolnshire, improved communication between UTCs and hospitals was so significant that teams began developing joint clinical training plans, something that hadn’t been possible before.
That kind of behavioural change only happens when tools align with real clinical workflows.
Commissioners are rarely approving isolated pilots. They’re thinking about scale, consistency, and system-wide impact.
That’s why confidence from clinical and system leaders matters.
An ICB Clinical Lead in LLR put it simply during a pathway review:
“Thank you for building such wonderful software… Every ICB should be using it.”
In Gloucestershire, former NHS CEO Mary Hutton echoed this sentiment:
“Keep up the good work, the NHS needs Cinapsis.”
When leaders see benefits across providers, workflows and pathways, it signals readiness for broader adoption.
Across all these conversations, a clear pattern emerges.
Successful NHS digital transformation:
That’s when change sticks.
Commissioners don’t need more promises.
They need confidence grounded in real outcomes.
If you’re exploring pathway modernisation and asking similar questions, we’re always happy to share what we’ve learned.
👉 Get in touch to discuss your local pathways and challenges.